Eifs Siding Reviews

Today the eifs market segment is less than 5 percent for residential construction.

Eifs siding reviews.

Furthermore as long ago as 2002 eifs detractors began to re assess their favor for the systems. Better control of moisture than stucco brick or fiber cement but only when properly installed. Using the soft styrofoam substrate allows the builder to use less of cement stucco material. Impacts to the surface can result in cracks.

But that would all change by the end of the century. According to recent research conducted at the department of energy s oak ridge national laboratory eifs were validated as the best performing cladding in terms of moisture and thermal control compared to brick stucco and fiber cement siding systems. Because of the multiple layering eifs is a better insulator than traditional stucco siding. It may surprise you to know that at one time 30 percent of the eifs business was in the residential market.

Lighter than stucco or brick. A range of attractive finishes that mimic stucco brick and metallic siding. One of the major perks of using fiber cement siding boards is that their trim can easily be installed over built out sections of eifs covered exteriors. By the mid 1980s eifs was commonly found in most mid to upper priced residential developments throughout the country.

Eifs is usually sprayed onto mesh that is mounted to styrofoam type of material. The durability of stucco. If you are ready to replace one of these systems fiber cement siding manufactured by the james hardie company is the best choice for the job. It is also more flexible allowing ornate keystones cornerstones and other accents that traditional stucco previously could not hold.

Here are exterior insulation finish systems advantages and disadvantages to consider as you compare them with traditional stucco siding and other types.